Will ‘sigh of relief’ after US supreme court gun ruling be short-lived?
Domestic abusers still may not possess guns, but first case decided since 2022 Bruen decision likely won’t be the lastThe US supreme court decided to uphold a 30-year-old federal law prohibiting subjects of domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs) from possessing guns. In Friday’s 8-1 decision, justices – except Clarence Thomas – agreed that Zackey Rahimi’s constitutional rights were not violated when his guns were confiscated following a lengthy history of gun crimes and abuse against his then girlfriend and mother of his child.While the ruling is not a surprise to many experts who heard the 7 November 2023 oral argument, it represents a small victory for those who advocate for protection orders like DVROs and work with survivors of domestic abuse. Continue reading...
![Will ‘sigh of relief’ after US supreme court gun ruling be short-lived?](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/7d49e698ff29156f505162b9d87fdfd7e4e73e84/0_331_5000_3002/master/5000.jpg?width=140&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=18a07cbfebc5c02ca3af24735f3cc3d4#)
Domestic abusers still may not possess guns, but first case decided since 2022 Bruen decision likely won’t be the last
The US supreme court decided to uphold a 30-year-old federal law prohibiting subjects of domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs) from possessing guns. In Friday’s 8-1 decision, justices – except Clarence Thomas – agreed that Zackey Rahimi’s constitutional rights were not violated when his guns were confiscated following a lengthy history of gun crimes and abuse against his then girlfriend and mother of his child.
While the ruling is not a surprise to many experts who heard the 7 November 2023 oral argument, it represents a small victory for those who advocate for protection orders like DVROs and work with survivors of domestic abuse. Continue reading...